From: Dr. J
Date: 2/8/01
Subject: A Urologist's "Exceedingly Rare" Message
I read your story in the New Times. Your
experiences are unfortunate, but contrary to your assertions, rare. I
perform vasectomies in the North County [of San Luis Obispo], and have
had very favorable outcomes. Pain is variable, lasting one day to two
weeks, but after performing greater than 100 vasectomies and being
involved in many more in residency, I have never seen, heard of, or been
involved in a case of post-vasectomy pain syndrome. I have to agree, it
is not talked about in our circles, and that is because it is
exceedingly rare - not 6-25% as you assert! In my practice, greater than
75% of all my vasectomy patients have no pain three days after the
procedure.
There is no doubt that people should be
aware of your rare consequences - this should be included in
"informed consent." I also respect the research you put into
this and the responsible way you communicated in the article.
Unfortunately, I can't say the same for the author of the article, who
is misinformed about very important aspects of the procedure, and makes
claims that perpetuate myths about vasectomies. First, the penis is not
cut as one might infer from the picture on the cover. Second, there is
not a consensus of information that links prostate cancer with
vasectomies - claims should not be made either way! Anatomically and
physiologically, there is absolutely no explainable relationship between
vasectomies and prostate cancer. Autoantibodies and sperm granuloma are
common, up to 40%, but rarely an issue.
Also, there are numerous ways to perform
the procedure. The diagram is not universal by any means. I use the
No-Scalpel approach, which does not require any incisions, just a 3mm
midline puncture. I fulgurate (burn) the prostatic end of the vas and
use fascial interposition to cover that same end with the
"purse" that normally holds the vas. I do not ligate either
vas deferens as depicted in the picture. As Dr. Clayton alluded to, the
physician should take great care not to cut or tie the nerve, or the
possibility of chronic pain increases, as one would expect.
Not all vasectomies are the same - not
all people are the same - and not all doctors are meticulous and
conscientious. We have never seen your type of complication, and I don't
expect we will. The article in New Times, to some extent perpetuates
myths and looks at the procedure very simplistically and from one
perspective. I think the article will unnecessarily scare prospective
patients, and moves us back in time with respect to options regarding
permanent sterilization.
Vasectomies are invasive procedures, and
with invasive procedures come risks - but so does birth control pills
and certainly tubal ligation. People die from tubal ligation and general
anesthesia - I have not heard of this complication from vasectomies. As
alluded to, pain syndromes are not well understood and can result from
any type of invasive procedure, not just vasectomies. I am positive that
there are reports of similar circumstances with tubal ligations and
other operations.
Your circumstances are unfortunate. I
will certainly be more exhaustive in my informed consents, but your
experiences are not exclusive to vasectomies. I think the article was a
tad irresponsible, short sighted, and unnecessarily scared a community
about a procedure that is effective, well tolerated, and generally safe.
I sincerely believe that it is the best method of permanent
sterilization versus tubal ligation, and a better answer than abortion
or unwanted pregnancies.
Best regards!
Response: Where do I start with
this? First, I sincerely appreciate you taking the time to express this
opinion in an open and eloquent manner, Dr. J. There are several points
on which we do agree, and several others where we will obviously have to
disagree.
First, in regards to the rarity of my
circumstance and other men like me, please note: "Chronic scrotal
pain is the most common post-vasectomy complaint that may adversely
affect quality of life in men undergoing vasectomy" Choe et al,
Journal of Urology, 1996. "A third of vasectomy patients develop
chronic testicular discomfort but only a few develop more severe pain
that requires further surgical treatment. Informed consent needs to take
account of this finding" McMahon et al, British Journal of Urology,
1992. Those are not my words, but the words of your colleagues in your
profession. Based upon this, it would appear that while the extremity of
my pain experience may be more exceptional, the incidence of chronic
pain following vasectomy is quite commonplace. Even a little bit of this
stuff can be agonizing. The problem, in my experience, is that most
doctors do not discuss this issue in any form before surgery, as was my
case and many others. Additionally, doctors often do not ask their
patients about any pain experiences and when patients do complain, they
typically dismiss patient's complaints about pain developing after the
procedure in a variety of ways as being inconsequential, and quite
literally leave their patients flapping in the breeze. This has been
seen over and over again, even with doctors you know personally.
In regards to prostate cancer studies,
yes you are right, there is controversy over this issue, and it should
be presented to the patient as such. When I asked the question before my
surgery, I was told that all of the studies demonstrating a link between
vasectomy and prostate cancer had been "disproven." Actually,
when 14 studies on the issue were analyzed by Bernal-Delgado et al and
published in 1998, 11 of those 14 studies demonstrated a link between
vasectomy and an increased incidence of prostate cancer. The key issue
has been that doctors and researchers don't know exactly why this may
happen, not that it doesn't necessarily happen. The information should
be presented in this context, and again, let the patient decide what is
relevant for him. In my case, I have a family history of prostate cancer
going back at least two generations that I know of, and I would have
wanted to know these facts in weighing my decision. I know I'm not alone
in this.
My urologist used the No-Scalpel
technique for my vasectomy per my request, as you use, and claimed to
have performed over a thousand vasectomies at the time. I am sure that
he is a competent and skilled surgeon in many ways, but the point is,
negative outcomes can happen to anyone and have on a regular basis. This
needs to be disclosed.
In regards to "scare tactics"
used in the article, talk to any man who has experienced chronic
testicular pain as the result of vasectomy about how scared he has felt.
In regards to the lack of fatalities due to vasectomy, see Viddeleer et
al, Journal of Urology, 1992, "Lethal Fournier's Gangrene Following
Vasectomy." It's not pretty. Again, it can happen.
The core issue here is not sterilization,
but contraception. Sterilization is just one way to accomplish this
goal. The problem is that surgical sterilization, for men and women is
often under-disclosed in terms of the risks and consequences. The same
is true for hormonal contraception for women, though awareness about
this issue is increasing. My contention is that if the truth were known
about the effects of vasectomy and tubal ligation on the human body,
most patients would choose another form of contraception. This also
means that we all need to be more open about this issue, and develop
better methods in the long run that do not sacrifice the health of the
living for the sake of trying to ward off the unborn.
I commend your commitment to increased
efforts at informed consent regarding vasectomy, and hope others will
join you in that commitment. This effort of mine is not intended as
doctor bashing, but as a wake up call to doctors and patients regarding
an important issue. Thank you for answering the call.
|
From: CO
Date: 1/24/01
Subject: Docs Don't Really Know
Regarding the suggestion that urologists
know how to treat those of us who get post-vasectomy pain, I beg to
differ. I have been shuffled amongst many urologists. I was the subject
of a conference meeting of 12 urologists in the Portland, Maine and
Boston, Massachusetts areas. They had no idea what to do. They only
expressed their views on what they personally wouldn't do. I have been
to five pain clinics, and as of yet they really do not have the answers.
Perhaps there is a silent conspiracy about post-vasectomy pain. The docs
fear getting involved in such a hot and taboo diagnosis because they
fear legal involvement and even worse fear the retribution form other
doctors if they speak out. Every doctor I saw before the three-year
saut� of limitations was up asked me if it was a legal case, and told
me if it was, they wouldn't treat me. Doctors are too timid and afraid
to do what their own profession suggests will work. There are a lot of
documents that suggest EARLY interventions of many kinds (mostly
surgical and steroid anti-inflamatories) are very successful in treating
PVP. Yet all through the Northeast, including the Mecca of medicine in
Boston, he doctors either don't admit to knowing or actually don't know
of all these research findings. There are more articles on PVP from
other countries than there are from the U.S. Is it any coincidence that
the U. S. is litigation hell?
I really do not think the doctors know
what to do with PVP. From the research I have found, it seems very
apparent that until you stop the production of sperm, you will
constantly have a supply trying to exit the testis and putting undue
pressure on the tubules of the epididymis. If you do not shut off the
supply, you are at great risk for continual leaks and sperm granulomas.
I know a few guys who had vasectomy reversal to remove the obstruction
and allow the sperm to pass without building up. These men no longer
have pain. I know that the suggestions here end up making you think of
drastic measures to relieve this simple plumbing problem of supply input
without output.
Even in pain clinics that place
intrathecal catheters in your spine and infuse morphine and other drugs
into the cerebrospinal fluid, they are only hoping to interrupt the
progression of pain impulses before they reach the brain. They have no
real answers, only logical theoretical conclusions. But at least some of
these doctors are willing to try. They demonstrate at least some
analytic sense and investigative fervor. The doctors who fear getting
involved don't. If any one of you finds a doctor that knows what to do,
please post it here and we'll go see him or her. Now you know why I
picked the email name "Ragingballs." They are raging in pain
and I am raging in disgust for the lack of due diligence on the doctors'
part.
Hope you are all getting better. I
certainly am not.
Response: This opinion is
difficult to dispute in light of his experience, isn't it? I've had good
luck with the Pain Clinic at Stanford University Hospital in Palo Alto,
CA. Dr. Steve Mangar has been excellent in his approach to my treatment.
The pain clinic phone number is 650-723-6238. Mention my name to him and
he'll get the picture of what you're talking about.
Kevin
|